<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>GRID THE GREY — AI Threat Intelligence | GRID THE GREY</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/</link><description>Real-time AI security intelligence — adversarial ML, LLM vulnerabilities, and supply chain threats mapped to MITRE ATLAS and OWASP LLM Top 10.</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright/><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 11:11:56 +0530</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://gridthegrey.com/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Microsoft Scout Autonomous Agent Expands Attack Surface Across Microsoft 365</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/microsoft-scout-autonomous-agent-expands-attack-surface-across-microsoft-365/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 05:41:41 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/microsoft-scout-autonomous-agent-expands-attack-surface-across-microsoft-365/</guid><category>Threat Level: MEDIUM</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Industry News</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0012 - Valid Accounts</category><category>AML.T0040 - ML Model Inference API Access</category><description>Microsoft has launched Scout, an always-on autonomous AI agent built on the OpenClaw framework that operates across Microsoft 365 apps including Teams, Outlook, OneDrive, and SharePoint with its own Entra identity. The agent's persistent, unsupervised access to email, calendar, chat, and external systems via MCP creates a broad new attack surface for prompt injection, privilege abuse, and data exfiltration. As an experimental release with limited deployment controls, security teams should treat Scout as a high-risk agentic surface requiring careful governance before broad adoption.</description></item><item><title>High-Autonomy AI Agents With Broad Permissions Pose Enterprise Security Crisis</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/high-autonomy-ai-agents-with-broad-permissions-pose-enterprise-security-crisis/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 05:40:36 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/high-autonomy-ai-agents-with-broad-permissions-pose-enterprise-security-crisis/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Industry News</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0012 - Valid Accounts</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><description>Enterprises deploying AI agents with elevated permissions and minimal oversight face compounding security risks as agentic systems gain the ability to take real-world actions with limited human intervention. The attack surface expands dramatically when agents can access APIs, execute code, and chain decisions autonomously, making containment of a compromise significantly harder. Security teams must implement least-privilege principles and robust monitoring before agentic deployments scale beyond their ability to govern.</description></item><item><title>Indirect Prompt Injection via Notifications Hijacks Google Gemini on Android</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/indirect-prompt-injection-via-notifications-hijacks-google-gemini-on-android/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 05:39:55 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/indirect-prompt-injection-via-notifications-hijacks-google-gemini-on-android/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Prompt Injection</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>Research</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><description>SafeBreach researcher Or Yair demonstrated that malicious text embedded in WhatsApp, Slack, SMS, or Signal notifications could trigger indirect prompt injection against Google Gemini's Android Utilities feature, causing the assistant to execute real device actions without user awareness. A novel bypass technique called 'Fake Context Alignment' defeated Google's post-patch authorization checks by exploiting multilingual obfuscation and muted hyperlinks to trick victims into authorising sensitive actions. Google has patched the issue, but the research exposes a fundamentally large attack surface where any app capable of pushing a notification becomes a potential injection vector.</description></item><item><title>Only 11 of 100 AI Agents Pass Security and Capability Benchmarks</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/only-11-of-100-ai-agents-pass-security-and-capability-benchmarks/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 05:38:21 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/only-11-of-100-ai-agents-pass-security-and-capability-benchmarks/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Prompt Injection</category><category>Research</category><category>Industry News</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0040 - ML Model Inference API Access</category><category>AML.T0054 - LLM Jailbreak</category><description>Adversa AI's AI Risk Quadrant report evaluated 100 AI agents across ten categories, finding that only 11 qualify as both capable and well-defended. The research identifies a structural 'power-protection inversion' where the most capable agents also present the widest attack surface, driven by a 'lethal trifecta' of private data access, exposure to untrusted content, and outbound action capability. Computer and coding agents showed the most severe exposure, raising urgent concerns about autonomous agent deployment in enterprise environments.</description></item><item><title>Prompt Injection Flaw in Gemini Voice Assistant Enables Notification-Based Attacks</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/prompt-injection-flaw-in-gemini-voice-assistant-enables-notification-based/</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 05:37:37 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/prompt-injection-flaw-in-gemini-voice-assistant-enables-notification-based/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Prompt Injection</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><description>A prompt injection vulnerability in Google Gemini's voice assistant allows attackers to embed malicious instructions within device notifications, which the assistant then processes as legitimate commands. This attack vector enables social engineering, unauthorized actions, and potential data exfiltration without direct user interaction with the malicious payload. The flaw highlights the growing risk of indirect prompt injection in ambient AI assistants that consume untrusted content from the surrounding environment.</description></item><item><title>2,000 AI-Built Apps Expose Corporate Data via Misconfigured Vibe-Coding Platforms</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/2000-ai-built-apps-expose-corporate-data-via-misconfigured-vibe-coding-platforms/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 01:44:50 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/2000-ai-built-apps-expose-corporate-data-via-misconfigured-vibe-coding-platforms/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Supply Chain</category><category>Industry News</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><category>AML.T0012 - Valid Accounts</category><category>AML.T0040 - ML Model Inference API Access</category><description>A Red Access investigation found over 2,000 corporate applications built on AI-assisted 'vibe-coding' platforms publicly accessible on the open internet, many containing sensitive business data with no access controls. These shadow-built apps connect directly to production systems — CRMs, ERPs, BI tools — creating a new class of unaudited attack surface invisible to conventional security stacks. Traditional controls such as CASB, DLP, and EDR are structurally blind to this threat because the risk originates at the application layer, not the identity or network layer.</description></item><item><title>Anthropic Documents Sandbox Escape Risks and Credential Exfiltration Vectors in Claude Products</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/anthropic-documents-sandbox-escape-risks-and-credential-exfiltration-vectors-in/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 01:34:23 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/anthropic-documents-sandbox-escape-risks-and-credential-exfiltration-vectors-in/</guid><category>Threat Level: MEDIUM</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>Research</category><category>Industry News</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0012 - Valid Accounts</category><description>Anthropic has published detailed documentation of its sandboxing architecture across Claude.ai, Claude Code, and Claude Cowork, including disclosure of a previously identified credential exfiltration vector via the api.anthropic.com/v1/files endpoint. The writeup covers process-level isolation technologies including gVisor, Seatbelt, Bubblewrap, and full VM approaches, and candidly acknowledges security gaps that were missed. This transparency is notable for the agentic AI space, where sandbox documentation is typically sparse and trust is difficult to calibrate.</description></item><item><title>ChatGPhish Exploit Turns ChatGPT Summarisation Into a Live Phishing Surface</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/chatgphish-exploit-turns-chatgpt-summarisation-into-a-live-phishing-surface/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 01:33:33 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/chatgphish-exploit-turns-chatgpt-summarisation-into-a-live-phishing-surface/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Prompt Injection</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>Research</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><description>Permiso Security has disclosed ChatGPhish, a vulnerability in ChatGPT's web summarisation feature that allows attacker-controlled Markdown payloads embedded in third-party pages to render phishing links, spoofed alerts, and QR codes directly within ChatGPT's trusted UI. The attack requires no user interaction beyond asking ChatGPT to summarise a malicious page, and can exfiltrate IP addresses, User-Agent strings, and Referer headers via auto-fetched remote images. The technique significantly expands the phishing attack surface beyond email into everyday AI-assisted browsing workflows, posing a particular risk in enterprise environments.</description></item><item><title>LLMShare Campaign Weaponises ChatGPT Sharing Feature to Distribute Malware</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/llmshare-campaign-weaponises-chatgpt-sharing-feature-to-distribute-malware/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 01:32:53 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/llmshare-campaign-weaponises-chatgpt-sharing-feature-to-distribute-malware/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Supply Chain</category><category>Industry News</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><category>AML.T0015 - Evade ML Model</category><description>Threat actors are exploiting ChatGPT's legitimate content-sharing infrastructure to host convincing fake outage pages that trick users into downloading malware disguised as a ChatGPT desktop application. The 'LLMShare' campaign abuses chatgpt.com/s/ shared links to render attacker-crafted HTML within a trusted OpenAI domain, bypassing traditional phishing detection that relies on suspicious URL analysis. The attack chain combines Google ad abuse, domain cloaking, and AI platform misuse to deliver what are likely infostealer payloads.</description></item><item><title>Process-Level CAPTCHA Analysis Exposes Behavioural Fingerprints of AI Agents</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/process-level-captcha-analysis-exposes-behavioural-fingerprints-of-ai-agents/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 01:32:12 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/process-level-captcha-analysis-exposes-behavioural-fingerprints-of-ai-agents/</guid><category>Threat Level: MEDIUM</category><category>Adversarial ML</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>Research</category><category>AML.T0015 - Evade ML Model</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><description>Researchers have developed CogCAPTCHA30, a 30-task cognitive battery demonstrating that AI agents (GPT, Claude, Gemini) solve CAPTCHAs with statistically distinguishable behavioural patterns despite matching human accuracy. The study introduces a 'Process Turing Test' concept, showing output equivalence and process equivalence are uncorrelated — meaning AI agents can be detected not by what they answer, but by how they answer. This has direct implications for bot detection, anti-automation defences, and the arms race between AI-driven agents and human-verification systems.</description></item><item><title>Robinhood MCP Integration Grants AI Agents Autonomous Financial Trading Powers</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/robinhood-mcp-integration-grants-ai-agents-autonomous-financial-trading-powers/</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 01:31:37 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/robinhood-mcp-integration-grants-ai-agents-autonomous-financial-trading-powers/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Prompt Injection</category><category>Industry News</category><category>Regulatory</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0040 - ML Model Inference API Access</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><category>AML.T0012 - Valid Accounts</category><description>Robinhood has launched agentic trading and a virtual credit card that allow third-party AI agents to autonomously execute stock trades and payments on behalf of users via a Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration. This architecture introduces significant attack surface through prompt injection, excessive agency, and insecure plugin design risks inherent to LLM-driven autonomous financial action. The delegation of real financial authority to AI agents with limited human-in-the-loop controls represents a systemic risk to retail investors if agent pipelines are compromised or manipulated.</description></item><item><title>Malicious npm Package Targets Claude AI Users via Supply Chain Attack</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/malicious-npm-package-targets-claude-ai-users-via-supply-chain-attack/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:10:53 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/malicious-npm-package-targets-claude-ai-users-via-supply-chain-attack/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>Supply Chain</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Industry News</category><category>AML.T0010 - ML Supply Chain Compromise</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><category>AML.T0012 - Valid Accounts</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><description>A malicious npm package named 'mouse5212-super-formatter' was discovered exfiltrating files from Anthropic's Claude AI user directory by authenticating to a threat actor-controlled GitHub repository. The package disguised itself as a legitimate archive utility while silently uploading all local workspace files during the postinstall phase. Notably, the attacker's poor operational security — including a leaked GitHub token — suggests AI-generated malware with minimal human oversight, pointing to a growing trend of low-skill threat actors leveraging AI to produce supply chain malware.</description></item><item><title>Multi-Agent LLM System Discovers 29 Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Open-Source Projects</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/multi-agent-llm-system-discovers-29-zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-open-source/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:10:04 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/multi-agent-llm-system-discovers-29-zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-open-source/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>Research</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0040 - ML Model Inference API Access</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><description>Researchers have developed FuzzingBrain V2, a multi-agent LLM system capable of autonomously discovering and reproducing software vulnerabilities with a 90% detection rate on a competitive benchmark dataset. The system discovered 29 zero-day vulnerabilities across 12 open-source projects, all confirmed by maintainers, raising both defensive and dual-use concerns for the security community. While positioned as a defensive research tool, the automation of end-to-end vulnerability discovery at this scale represents a meaningful shift in the offensive capability landscape.</description></item><item><title>Russia-Linked GreyVibe Weaponises ChatGPT and Gemini Across Full Attack Lifecycle</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/russia-linked-greyvibe-weaponises-chatgpt-and-gemini-across-full-attack/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 10:09:20 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/russia-linked-greyvibe-weaponises-chatgpt-and-gemini-across-full-attack/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Adversarial ML</category><category>Industry News</category><category>Research</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0015 - Evade ML Model</category><description>WithSecure has documented GreyVibe, a Russia-nexus threat actor systematically deploying ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Ideogram AI across every phase of its attack chain — from phishing lure creation to custom malware development — against Ukrainian targets since August 2025. The group's LLM-assisted malware, LegionRelay, contained design flaws introduced during AI-generated development, which paradoxically allowed researchers to track the group over an extended period. The case illustrates both the operational leverage AI provides to moderately skilled threat actors and the novel forensic signatures that AI-assisted development can inadvertently introduce.</description></item><item><title>Russian GreyVibe Group Weaponises ChatGPT and Gemini for Cyberespionage</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/russian-greyvibe-group-weaponises-chatgpt-and-gemini-for-cyberespionage/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:21:08 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/russian-greyvibe-group-weaponises-chatgpt-and-gemini-for-cyberespionage/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Industry News</category><category>Research</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><description>A likely Russian threat group dubbed GreyVibe has been actively using commercial LLMs — including ChatGPT and Google Gemini — to generate high-quality phishing lures, malware tooling, and social-engineering content targeting Ukrainian military, government, and civilian organisations. WithSecure researchers identified LLM artefact markers embedded in campaign imagery, confirming AI-assisted content generation at scale. The case represents a concrete, documented example of adversarial LLM weaponisation in an active nation-state-adjacent cyberespionage campaign.</description></item><item><title>SQLite Bans Agentic Code Submissions as AI Bug Report Floods Begin</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/sqlite-bans-agentic-code-submissions-as-ai-bug-report-floods-begin/</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:17:23 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/sqlite-bans-agentic-code-submissions-as-ai-bug-report-floods-begin/</guid><category>Threat Level: MEDIUM</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>Industry News</category><category>Research</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><description>SQLite has formally prohibited agentic code contributions and strengthened its policy language, reflecting growing concern over AI-generated submissions overwhelming open source maintainers. The project was forced to create a separate bug forum after being flooded with AI-generated reports of inconsistent quality. This represents an emerging operational security challenge for critical infrastructure software projects targeted by autonomous AI coding agents.</description></item><item><title>AI Bills of Materials Emerge as Critical Tool for ML Supply Chain Risk</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/ai-bills-of-materials-emerge-as-critical-tool-for-ml-supply-chain-risk/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 15:44:14 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/ai-bills-of-materials-emerge-as-critical-tool-for-ml-supply-chain-risk/</guid><category>Threat Level: MEDIUM</category><category>Supply Chain</category><category>Regulatory</category><category>Industry News</category><category>Research</category><category>AML.T0010 - ML Supply Chain Compromise</category><category>AML.T0020 - Poison Training Data</category><category>AML.T0031 - Erode ML Model Integrity</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><description>As AI systems proliferate across enterprise environments, the lack of standardised AI Bills of Materials (AI BOMs) leaves organisations blind to the components, training data, and dependencies embedded in deployed models. The article examines whether 2026 marks a turning point for AI BOM adoption as a risk management practice. Without visibility into AI supply chains, organisations remain exposed to hidden vulnerabilities including poisoned models, compromised dependencies, and undisclosed third-party components.</description></item><item><title>Anthropic's Claude Mythos Autonomously Uncovers 10,000 Critical Software Flaws</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/anthropic-s-claude-mythos-autonomously-uncovers-10000-critical-software-flaws/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 15:43:34 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/anthropic-s-claude-mythos-autonomously-uncovers-10000-critical-software-flaws/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>Research</category><category>Industry News</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0040 - ML Model Inference API Access</category><category>AML.T0043 - Craft Adversarial Data</category><description>Anthropic's Project Glasswing has deployed Claude Mythos Preview — a frontier AI model — to autonomously discover over 10,000 high- and critical-severity vulnerabilities across widely used open-source software, with 1,094 confirmed as valid high/critical flaws. The initiative highlights a growing asymmetry: AI is accelerating vulnerability discovery far faster than the security community can remediate, compressing patch windows and raising the stakes for defenders. Anthropic is now urging shorter patch cycles and hardened defaults, warning that comparable offensive capabilities could soon be broadly accessible to threat actors.</description></item><item><title>LLM Coding Agents Collapse Under Structural Constraints, Study Finds</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/llm-coding-agents-collapse-under-structural-constraints-study-finds/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 15:42:13 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/llm-coding-agents-collapse-under-structural-constraints-study-finds/</guid><category>Threat Level: HIGH</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>Research</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0031 - Erode ML Model Integrity</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><description>A systematic study of LLM agents performing backend code generation reveals a 'constraint decay' phenomenon where agents lose up to 30 assertion pass-rate points as structural requirements accumulate, approaching complete failure in some configurations. This fragility has direct security implications: production deployments relying on LLM-generated code may silently violate architectural constraints such as ORM patterns, database access controls, and API contracts. The findings expose a critical gap between functional correctness and structural safety in agentic coding systems.</description></item><item><title>SentinelOne Prompt Security Targets Agentic AI Trust Verification Gap</title><link>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/sentinelone-prompt-security-targets-agentic-ai-trust-verification-gap/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 15:42:13 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://gridthegrey.com/posts/sentinelone-prompt-security-targets-agentic-ai-trust-verification-gap/</guid><category>Threat Level: MEDIUM</category><category>Agentic AI</category><category>LLM Security</category><category>Prompt Injection</category><category>Industry News</category><category>AML.T0051 - LLM Prompt Injection</category><category>AML.T0057 - LLM Data Leakage</category><category>AML.T0047 - ML-Enabled Product or Service</category><category>AML.T0056 - LLM Meta Prompt Extraction</category><description>SentinelOne has published guidance on securing agentic AI systems, framing unverified trust in AI agents as a core enterprise risk. The piece promotes their Prompt Security product as a control layer for AI tools, agents, and pipelines deployed across the enterprise. While primarily a product-focused announcement, it highlights the genuine security challenge of blind trust in autonomous AI agents executing actions on behalf of users and systems.</description></item></channel></rss>