LIVE THREATS
HIGH Malicious npm Package Targets Claude AI Users via Supply Chain Attack // HIGH Multi-Agent LLM System Discovers 29 Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Open-Source Projects // HIGH Russia-Linked GreyVibe Weaponises ChatGPT and Gemini Across Full Attack Lifecycle // HIGH Russian GreyVibe Group Weaponises ChatGPT and Gemini for Cyberespionage // MEDIUM SQLite Bans Agentic Code Submissions as AI Bug Report Floods Begin // MEDIUM AI Bills of Materials Emerge as Critical Tool for ML Supply Chain Risk // HIGH Anthropic's Claude Mythos Autonomously Uncovers 10,000 Critical Software Flaws // HIGH LLM Coding Agents Collapse Under Structural Constraints, Study Finds // MEDIUM SentinelOne Prompt Security Targets Agentic AI Trust Verification Gap // MEDIUM Google's Gemini Spark Agent Raises Prompt Injection Risks at Enterprise Scale //

Scoring Methodology

AI SECURITYScoring Methodology

How We Score Articles

Every article published on Grid the Grey is evaluated by the Claude AI model across two dimensions: Relevance Score and Threat Level. This ensures only the most significant AI security developments reach you.


Relevance Score (0–10)

The relevance score measures how closely an article relates to AI security, machine learning threats, LLM vulnerabilities, or related adversarial techniques.

Score RangeMeaning
8.0 – 10.0Highly relevant — direct AI/ML security impact, novel techniques, or active exploitation
6.0 – 7.9Relevant — significant AI security implications, important for practitioners
Below 6.0Not published — insufficient AI security relevance

Factors that raise the score:

  • Direct exploitation of AI/ML systems
  • Novel attack techniques against LLMs or ML pipelines
  • Active CVEs affecting AI infrastructure
  • Research from high-credibility sources (Google Project Zero, CISA, academic institutions)
  • Techniques mappable to MITRE ATLAS or OWASP LLM Top 10

Factors that lower the score:

  • Generic cybersecurity news with weak AI/ML connection
  • Marketing content or vendor announcements without technical depth
  • Duplicated coverage of an already-published story

Threat Level

The threat level classifies the operational urgency of a security issue:

LevelColourMeaning
CRITICALRedActive exploitation in the wild. Immediate review and action required.
HIGHOrangeHigh probability of exploitation. Prioritise patching or mitigation.
MEDIUMYellowModerate risk. Monitor for developments and plan remediation.
LOWGreenLimited impact. Standard review cycle is appropriate.

Threat level is assessed based on: CVSS scores where available, evidence of active exploitation, breadth of affected systems, and the sophistication of the attack technique.


Framework Mapping

In addition to scoring, every article is mapped (where applicable) to:

This mapping is performed by the Claude AI model using official MITRE ATLAS and OWASP LLM Top 10 taxonomies, cross-referenced against article content.

◉ AI THREAT BRIEFING

Stay ahead of the threat.

Twice-weekly digest of critical AI security developments — every story mapped to MITRE ATLAS and OWASP LLM Top 10. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.