Ai-Agents

Microsoft Copilot MCP Tool Poisoning Enables Data Exfiltration

ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 9.1 The Hacker News Jul 04, 2026

Microsoft researchers have demonstrated how attackers can embed hidden instructions inside MCP tool descriptions to covertly redirect AI agents into exfiltrating sensitive business data. Because each individual action the agent takes appears legitimate — using approved tools and the user's own permissions — default security controls generate no alerts. The attack exploits a fundamental design tension in MCP: tool descriptions simultaneously carry operational instructions and attacker-controlled data, collapsing a critical trust boundary.

IGA Platforms Add AI Agent Governance and Access Control

FIRST LOOK ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 7.8 The Hacker News Jul 03, 2026

A new analysis published via The Hacker News details how traditional Identity Governance and Administration (IGA) frameworks — built around HR-driven, human-centric lifecycle events — are fundamentally unequipped to govern AI agents acting as autonomous principals in enterprise environments. Security teams face a growing blind spot: AI agents acquire, retain, and exercise entitlements without triggering the joiner-mover-leaver workflows, manager attestations, or termination events that IGA tooling depends on. Defenders must now treat AI agent identities as a separate governance tier, requiring purpose-built provisioning, audit, and deprovisioning logic that existing platforms like Workday, SailPoint, and Azure AD connectors were never designed to provide.

Google DeepMind Releases AI Agent Attack Taxonomy

FIRST LOOK ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 8.7 SecurityWeek Jun 25, 2026

Google DeepMind researchers have released a structured taxonomy categorising adversarial attacks against autonomous AI agents into six classes — content injection, semantic manipulation, cognitive state poisoning, behavioural control, systemic, and human-in-the-loop traps — formalising an emerging threat model for agentic AI systems. For defenders, this framework codifies attack paths that exploit the agent's inability to distinguish trusted instructions from attacker-controlled data ingested from web pages, emails, documents, and tool outputs. NIST evaluation data cited in the research shows malicious instruction injection succeeded in 57% of tested agent hijacking scenarios on average, underscoring that these are active, high-yield attack vectors rather than theoretical concerns.

MoEngage Deploys Autonomous AI Agents via Aampe Acquisition

FIRST LOOK ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 6.8 TechCrunch AI Jun 24, 2026

MoEngage has acquired Aampe to deploy individualized AI agents for every customer, enabling autonomous decisions on messaging targeting, timing, and content at enterprise scale across 1,350+ brands globally. This architecture introduces a large, distributed fleet of autonomous agents operating on sensitive behavioral and PII data, dramatically expanding the blast radius of any single compromise. Security teams at enterprises adopting this platform must now reason about agent-level trust boundaries, data inference risks, and the amplification potential of adversarial manipulation across millions of simultaneous decision-making agents.

AI Agent Hijacking via Legacy Infrastructure Exploits

ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 7.5 The Hacker News Jun 23, 2026

Attackers are bypassing AI-layer defences entirely by exploiting unpatched legacy infrastructure — misconfigured Active Directory, stale credentials, and over-privileged IAM roles — to hijack the resources AI agents depend on. Research cited in the article shows 70% of organisations grant AI systems more access than a human in the same role, driving a 76% incident rate among over-privileged deployments. The article argues that securing AI agents requires closing the underlying infrastructure exposure gap, not just hardening the model layer.

Orphaned AI Agents Bypass SailPoint Identity Controls

ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 7.2 The Hacker News Jun 19, 2026

Enterprises deploying internal AI agents face a growing identity accountability gap: when the employee who created an autonomous agent leaves, the agent's access tokens and credentials often remain active and unmonitored. Traditional access management tools fail to detect this risk because they treat AI agents as static software rather than identity-bearing entities capable of exfiltrating sensitive data. The problem compounds at scale as shadow AI deployments proliferate across organizations without centralised visibility or ownership tracking.

Palo Alto Exposes AI Agent Skill Supply Chain Compromise Risk

ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 8.5 Palo Alto Unit 42 Jun 12, 2026

Palo Alto Unit 42 introduces Behavioral Integrity Verification (BIV), an audit method exposing widespread mismatches between what third-party AI agent skills claim to do and what they actually execute. Applied at registry scale, BIV identifies a dangerous subset of skills carrying multi-stage attack chains capable of credential theft, remote code execution, and silent data exfiltration. The research highlights that the AI agent skill ecosystem has grown rapidly without the supply-chain audit primitives that mobile and browser extension platforms eventually adopted after abuse.

CVE-2025-67644: LangGraph SQLi to RCE via Checkpointer

ATLAS OWASP CRITICAL ▲ 9.2 Check Point Research Jun 12, 2026

Check Point Research disclosed three vulnerabilities in LangGraph's persistence layer, two of which chain together to achieve remote code execution: a SQL injection flaw in the SQLite checkpointer (CVE-2025-67644) and an unsafe msgpack deserialization bug (CVE-2026-28277). A third parallel injection vulnerability (CVE-2026-27022) affects the Redis checkpointer. With over 50 million monthly downloads, self-hosted LangGraph deployments exposing user-controlled state history filters are directly at risk.

Claude Mythos Accelerates Automated Vulnerability Discovery

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM ▲ 6.5 SecurityWeek Jun 10, 2026

Anthropic's Claude Mythos model is accelerating automated vulnerability discovery to a degree that may fundamentally disrupt the bug bounty and offensive security industries. As AI transitions from a force multiplier to a potential replacement for human security researchers, the economics and structure of vulnerability disclosure programs face significant pressure. The shift raises critical questions about the future of human-led offensive security and whether AI-generated findings will saturate or devalue traditional bounty programs.

Excessive Agency in AI Agents Enables Enterprise Breaches

ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 7.2 Dark Reading Jun 04, 2026

Enterprises deploying AI agents with elevated permissions and minimal oversight face compounding security risks as agentic systems gain the ability to take real-world actions with limited human intervention. The attack surface expands dramatically when agents can access APIs, execute code, and chain decisions autonomously, making containment of a compromise significantly harder. Security teams must implement least-privilege principles and robust monitoring before agentic deployments scale beyond their ability to govern.

Adversa AI: 89% of AI Agents Fail Security Tests

ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 8.2 SecurityWeek Jun 04, 2026

Adversa AI's AI Risk Quadrant report evaluated 100 AI agents across ten categories, finding that only 11 qualify as both capable and well-defended. The research identifies a structural 'power-protection inversion' where the most capable agents also present the widest attack surface, driven by a 'lethal trifecta' of private data access, exposure to untrusted content, and outbound action capability. Computer and coding agents showed the most severe exposure, raising urgent concerns about autonomous agent deployment in enterprise environments.

CogCAPTCHA30 Fingerprints AI Agents via Behavioral Analysis

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM ▲ 6.5 HN AI Security May 31, 2026

Researchers have developed CogCAPTCHA30, a 30-task cognitive battery demonstrating that AI agents (GPT, Claude, Gemini) solve CAPTCHAs with statistically distinguishable behavioural patterns despite matching human accuracy. The study introduces a 'Process Turing Test' concept, showing output equivalence and process equivalence are uncorrelated — meaning AI agents can be detected not by what they answer, but by how they answer. This has direct implications for bot detection, anti-automation defences, and the arms race between AI-driven agents and human-verification systems.

SentinelOne Warns on Prompt Injection Risks in AI Agents

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM ▲ 6.5 SentinelOne Blog May 25, 2026

SentinelOne has published guidance on securing agentic AI systems, framing unverified trust in AI agents as a core enterprise risk. The piece promotes their Prompt Security product as a control layer for AI tools, agents, and pipelines deployed across the enterprise. While primarily a product-focused announcement, it highlights the genuine security challenge of blind trust in autonomous AI agents executing actions on behalf of users and systems.

AI Agent Identity Sprawl Bypasses Enterprise IAM Systems

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM ▲ 6.2 Dark Reading May 22, 2026

As AI agents proliferate across enterprise environments, their associated non-human identities are introducing governance and security gaps that traditional IAM frameworks were not designed to handle. New Omdia research highlights that AI agent identity management demands distinct budget allocations and security controls separate from conventional IAM programs. The failure to properly secure and govern these machine identities exposes organisations to credential abuse, privilege escalation, and lateral movement risks.

AI Agents Weaponise Vulnerability Discovery as AI-Generated Code Expands Attack Surface

ATLAS OWASP HIGH ▲ 7.5 Dark Reading May 17, 2026

AI agents are now capable of autonomously discovering and exploiting obscure software vulnerabilities, raising the stakes for defenders already struggling with the volume of potentially insecure AI-generated code flooding codebases. The convergence of agentic exploitation capabilities and mass AI-assisted development creates a compounding risk: more vulnerabilities introduced at scale, and more capable automated systems to find and abuse them. Security teams must adapt their tooling, processes, and threat models to account for both sides of this AI-driven equation.

Ai-Agents

Stay ahead of the threat.