LIVE FEED
Google Patches Prompt Injection RCE in Agentic AI

Google Patches Prompt Injection RCE in Agentic AI

ATLAS OWASP CRITICAL Active exploitation · Immediate action required ▲ 8.5 Dark Reading

Google has patched a critical prompt injection vulnerability in an agentic AI tool designed for filesystem operations, where insufficient input sanitisation enabled sandbox escape and arbitrary code execution. The flaw highlights the compounding risk surface of agentic AI systems that interface directly with operating system resources. This is a significant example of how LLM-native vulnerabilities can translate into traditional high-severity RCE outcomes.

CVE-2026: Google Antigravity Sandbox Escape via Prompt Injection

CVE-2026: Google Antigravity Sandbox Escape via Prompt Injection

ATLAS OWASP HIGH Significant risk · Prioritise patching ▲ 9.0 The Hacker News

A now-patched vulnerability in Google's agentic IDE Antigravity allowed attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by injecting malicious flags into the find_by_name tool's Pattern parameter, bypassing the platform's Strict Mode sandbox before security constraints were enforced. The attack chain could be triggered entirely via indirect prompt injection—embedding hidden instructions in files pulled from untrusted sources—requiring no account compromise and no additional user interaction. This case exemplifies the systemic risk of insufficient input validation in AI agent tool interfaces, where autonomous execution removes the human oversight layer that traditional security models depend on.

GoModel AI Gateway Supply Chain Compromise

GoModel AI Gateway Supply Chain Compromise

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM Moderate risk · Monitor closely ▲ 6.2 HN AI Security

GoModel is an open-source AI gateway written in Go that provides a unified OpenAI-compatible API across multiple LLM providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Groq, xAI, and Ollama. As an infrastructure layer sitting between applications and AI backends, it introduces a significant supply chain and API security surface that warrants scrutiny. The project advertises built-in guardrails and observability, which are positive security signals, but open-source gateway projects centralising multi-provider API key management represent a meaningful attack vector if misconfigured or compromised.

CVE-2026: Anthropic MCP SDK Remote Code Execution

CVE-2026: Anthropic MCP SDK Remote Code Execution

ATLAS OWASP CRITICAL Active exploitation · Immediate action required ▲ 9.4 The Hacker News

A systemic 'by design' vulnerability in Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) SDK enables arbitrary remote code execution across all supported language implementations via unsafe STDIO transport defaults, affecting over 7,000 publicly accessible servers and 150 million downloads. The flaw has been independently confirmed across 10+ popular AI frameworks including LiteLLM, LangChain, and Flowise, with Anthropic declining to modify the protocol's architecture. This represents a significant AI supply chain risk with cascading exposure to sensitive data, API keys, and internal systems.

Prompt Injection Risk: Claude 4.7 Agentic Tool Expansion

Prompt Injection Risk: Claude 4.7 Agentic Tool Expansion

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM Moderate risk · Monitor closely ▲ 6.2 HN AI Security

Anthropic's published system prompt diff between Claude Opus 4.6 and 4.7 reveals significant expansions in agentic tool access, autonomous browsing capabilities, and child safety guardrails — changes with direct security implications for prompt injection and excessive agency risks. The new `tool_search` mechanism and acting-before-asking posture increase the attack surface for adversarial inputs targeting agentic Claude deployments. Transparency in publishing these changes is notable, but the expanded autonomous capabilities warrant scrutiny from defenders.

Autonomous Exploit Generation: Claude Mythos Risk

Autonomous Exploit Generation: Claude Mythos Risk

ATLAS OWASP HIGH Significant risk · Prioritise patching ▲ 8.5 Schneier on Security

Bruce Schneier analyses Anthropic's Claude Mythos Preview and Project Glasswing, a controlled deployment programme aimed at finding and patching software vulnerabilities before the model is publicly released due to its advanced cyberattack capabilities. The piece highlights a growing offensive AI capability gap, noting that newer LLMs can autonomously chain memory corruption bugs and operationalise exploits without human orchestration, while observing that defenders currently retain a marginal advantage because vulnerability discovery is easier than exploitation. Schneier warns that this advantage is narrowing rapidly and that the industry must prepare for a world of commoditised zero-day exploits.

Legacy Vulnerabilities Amplified by AI at Enterprise Scale

Legacy Vulnerabilities Amplified by AI at Enterprise Scale

ATLAS OWASP HIGH Significant risk · Prioritise patching ▲ 6.5 Dark Reading

The article argues that AI's primary security risk lies not in introducing entirely new vulnerability classes, but in dramatically amplifying the impact and exploitability of well-established ones. This framing has significant implications for defenders, suggesting that legacy vulnerability management practices must be re-evaluated through an AI-augmented threat lens. The convergence of classic weaknesses with AI capabilities raises the baseline risk profile for organisations deploying or adjacent to AI systems.

Cursor AI Prompt Injection Chains to Shell Access

Cursor AI Prompt Injection Chains to Shell Access

ATLAS OWASP CRITICAL Active exploitation · Immediate action required ▲ 8.5 SecurityWeek

A chained vulnerability in Cursor AI—a widely-used AI-powered code editor—allowed attackers to combine indirect prompt injection with a sandbox escape and the application's built-in remote tunnel feature to achieve arbitrary shell access on developer machines. The attack chain is particularly significant because it weaponises Cursor's own legitimate remote-access infrastructure, meaning malicious commands could blend into normal developer workflows. Developers using Cursor's AI features against untrusted code or repositories are at elevated risk of full host compromise.

Comment Injection Attacks Hit Claude Code, Gemini, Copilot

Comment Injection Attacks Hit Claude Code, Gemini, Copilot

ATLAS OWASP HIGH Significant risk · Prioritise patching ▲ 8.2 SecurityWeek

A researcher has disclosed a novel prompt injection attack technique dubbed 'Comment and Control,' demonstrating that popular AI coding agents — including Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and GitHub Copilot Agents — can be manipulated through malicious instructions embedded in source code comments. The attack exploits the tendency of agentic coding tools to process and act upon contextual content within files they are tasked to read or modify. This represents a meaningful escalation in the risk surface of AI-assisted software development workflows.

GPT-5.4-Cyber Expansion Raises LLM Jailbreak Dual-Use Risks

GPT-5.4-Cyber Expansion Raises LLM Jailbreak Dual-Use Risks

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM Moderate risk · Monitor closely ▲ 6.5 SecurityWeek

OpenAI has expanded access to GPT-5.4-Cyber, a fine-tuned model designed for defensive cybersecurity applications, following Anthropic's reveal of its Mythos cybersecurity model. While framed as a defensive tool for legitimate security practitioners, the widened access to a capability-enhanced cybersecurity LLM raises dual-use concerns around potential misuse for offensive operations. The competitive dynamic between major AI labs in the security-focused model space signals a broader industry trend that warrants careful access control and policy scrutiny.

LLM Agents Exploit Human Over-Trust in Strategic Games

LLM Agents Exploit Human Over-Trust in Strategic Games

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM Moderate risk · Monitor closely ▲ 6.2 Schneier on Security

Research published via Schneier on Security reveals that humans systematically over-trust LLMs in strategic game environments, defaulting to Nash-equilibrium rational play based on assumptions of LLM rationality and cooperation. This behavioural bias has direct security implications for mixed human-LLM systems, where adversaries could exploit predictable human over-trust to manipulate decision outcomes. The findings underscore systemic risks in deploying LLMs as agents in high-stakes economic or security-relevant decision loops.

Agentic AI Excessive Agency Bypasses Security Testing

Agentic AI Excessive Agency Bypasses Security Testing

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM Moderate risk · Monitor closely ▲ 6.5 The Hacker News

The article examines the architectural tension between fully agentic AI systems and deterministic validation frameworks in security testing contexts, arguing that unconstrained AI autonomy introduces repeatability and auditability risks. It highlights how probabilistic AI behaviour — while valuable for exploration — undermines the measurable, consistent outcomes required for enterprise security validation programs. The piece reflects a broader industry debate about governing AI agency in high-stakes operational environments.

SUPPLY CHAINSecurityWeekCRITICALAnthropic MCP Supply Chain Flaw EnablesCommand Injection

Anthropic MCP Supply Chain Flaw Enables Command Injection

ATLAS OWASP CRITICAL Active exploitation · Immediate action required ▲ 9.1 SecurityWeek

A structural vulnerability in Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP) allows unsanitized commands to be executed silently within AI environments, potentially enabling full system compromise. Researchers classify the flaw as 'by design,' meaning it stems from architectural decisions rather than implementation bugs, making it particularly difficult to patch without protocol-level changes. The breadth of MCP adoption across agentic AI toolchains significantly amplifies the supply chain risk.

AGENTIC AISecurityWeekMEDIUMAI Agent Prompt Injection and Data LeakageThreats Rise

AI Agent Prompt Injection and Data Leakage Threats Rise

ATLAS OWASP MEDIUM Moderate risk · Monitor closely ▲ 6.5 SecurityWeek

Capsule Security, an Israeli startup, has emerged from stealth with $7 million in seed funding focused on runtime security for AI agents, continuously monitoring their behaviour to detect and prevent unsafe or malicious actions. This positions the company within the rapidly growing agentic AI security space, where autonomous agents executing actions on behalf of users represent a significant and underexplored attack surface. The funding signals growing investor recognition of the risks posed by unmonitored AI agent behaviour, including prompt injection, excessive agency, and unintended tool use.

0x4F0x3A0xFF0x0D0x7B0xC20xA10x550x0D0x7B0xC20xA10x550xE80x120x9F0xA10x550xE80x120x9F0xD40x2E0x880x120x9F0xD40x2E0x880x610xB30x4F0x2E0x880x610xB30x4F0x3A0xFF0x0D0xB30x4F0x3A0xFF0x0D0x7B0xC20xA10xFF0x0D0x7B0xC20xA10x550xE80x12LLM SECURITYDark ReadingHIGHPrompt Injection Flaws in Salesforce and AIMicrosoft

Prompt Injection Flaws in Salesforce and Microsoft AI

ATLAS OWASP HIGH Significant risk · Prioritise patching ▲ 8.2 Dark Reading

Prompt injection vulnerabilities in Salesforce Agentforce and Microsoft Copilot were patched after researchers demonstrated that external attackers could exploit them to exfiltrate sensitive user data. The flaws highlight systemic risks in enterprise AI agent deployments, where insufficient input sanitisation allows malicious content to hijack agent behaviour. Both vendors have issued patches, but the incidents underscore the growing attack surface introduced by agentic AI systems operating with elevated privileges.

◉ AI THREAT BRIEFING

Stay ahead of the threat.

Twice-weekly digest of critical AI security developments — every story mapped to MITRE ATLAS and OWASP LLM Top 10. Free.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.